The Jesuit New World Order

Monday, 26 November 2012

Fifty Years in the Church of rome                                                                      


Every time I met President Lincoln I wondered how such elevation of thought and such childish
simplicity could be found in the same man. After my interviews with him many times, I said to myself:
"How can this rail-splitter have so easily raised himself to the highest range of human thought and

The secret of this was, that Lincoln had spent a great part of his life at the school of Christ, and that he
meditated his sublime teachings to an extent unsuspected by the world. I found in him the most perfect
type of Christianity I ever met. Professedly, he was neither a strict Presbyterian, nor a Baptist, nor a
Methodist; but he was the embodiment of all which is more perfect and Christian in them. His religion
was the very essence of what God wants in man. It was from Christ Himself he had learned to love God
and his neighbour, as it was from Christ he had learned the dignity and the value of man. "Ye are all
brethren, the children of God," was his great motto.

It was from the Gospel that he had learned his principles of equality, fraternity, and liberty, as it was
from the Gospel he had learned that sublime, childish simplicity which, alone, and for ever, won the
admiration and affection of all those who approached him. I could cite many facts to illustrate this, but I
will give only one, not to be too long: it was taken from the Memoirs of Mr. Bateman, Superintendent of
Public Instruction for the State of Illinois.

"Mr. Lincoln paused: for long minutes, his features surcharged with emotion. Then he rose and walked
up and down the reception room, in the effort to retain or regain his self-possession. Stopping at last, he
said, with a trembling voice and his cheeks wet with tears: I know there is a God, and that He hates
injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and
work for me, and I think He has, I believe I am ready! I am nothing, but truth is everything! I know I am
right, because I know that liberty is right: for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God. I have told them that a
house divided against itself cannot stand, and Christ and reason say the same thing, and they will find it
so. Douglas does not care whether slavery is voted up or down. But God cares, and humanity cares, and
I care. And with God's help, I will not fail. I may not see the end, but it will come, and I shall be
vindicated; and those men will see that they have not read their Bible right! Does it not appear strange
that men can ignore the moral aspect of this contest? A revelation could not make it plainer to me that
slavery, or the Government, must be destroyed. The future would be something awful, as I look at it, but
for this ROCK on which I stand (alluding to the Gospel book he still held in his hand). It seems as if
God had borne with slavery until the very teachers of religion had come to defend it from the Bible, and
to claim for it a Divine character and sanction. And now the cup of iniquity is full, and the vials of wrath
will be poured out.'"

Mr. Bateman adds: "After this, the conversation was continued for a long time. Everything he said was
of a very deep, tender, and religious tone, and all was tinged with a touching melancholy. He repeatedly
referred to his conviction 'that the day of wrath was at hand,' and that he was to be an actor in the
struggle which would end in the overthrow of slavery, though he might not live to see the end. After
further reference to a belief in Divine Providence, and the fact of God, in history, the conversation
turned upon prayer. He freely stated his belief in the duty, privilege, and efficacy of prayer; and he
intimated, in no unmistakable terms, that he had sought, in that way, the divine guidance and favour."

The effect of this conversation upon the mind of Mr. Bateman, a Christian gentleman whom Mr. Lincoln
profoundly respected, was to convince him that Mr. Lincoln had, in his quiet way, found a path to the
Christian standpoint, that he had found God, and rested on the eternal truth of God. As the two men were
about to separate, Mr. Bateman remarked: "I had not supposed that you were accustomed to think so
much upon this class of subjects; certainly your friends generally are ignorant of the sentiments you
have expressed to me."

He quickly replied: "I know they are, but I think more on these subjects than upon all others, and I have
done so for years; and I am willing you should know it."*

More than once I felt as if I were in the presence of an old prophet, when listening to his views about the
future destinies of the United States. In one of my last interviews with him, I was filled with an
admiration which it would be difficult to express, when I heard the following views and predictions:

"It is with the Southern leaders of this civil war as with the big and small wheels of our railroad cars.
Those who ignore the laws of mechanics are apt to think that the large, strong, and noisy wheels they see
are the motive power, but they are mistaken. The real motive power is not seen; it is noiseless and well
concealed in the dark, behind its iron walls. The motive power are the few well-concealed pails of water
heated into steam, which is itself directed by the noiseless, small but unerring engineer's finger.

"The common people see and hear the big, noisy wheels of the Southern Confederacy's cars; they call
they Jeff Davis, Lee, Toombs, Beauregard, Semmes, ect., and they honestly think that they are the
motive power, the first cause of our troubles. But this is a mistake. The true motive power is secreted
behind the thick walls of the Vatican, the colleges and schools of the Jesuits, the convents of the nuns,
and the confessional boxes of Rome.

"There is a fact which is too much ignored by the American people, and with which I am acquainted
only since I became President; it is that the best, the leading families of the South have received their
education in great part, if not in whole, from the Jesuits and the nuns. Hence those degrading principles
of slavery, pride, cruelty, which are as a second nature among so many of those people. Hence that
strange want of fair play, humanity; that implacable hatred against the ideas of equality and liberty as we
find them in the Gospel of Christ. You do not ignore that the first settlers of Louisiana, Florida, New
Mexico, Texas, South California and Missouri were Roman Catholics, and that their first teachers were
Jesuits. It is true that those states have been conquered or bought by us since. But Rome had put the
deadly virus of her antisocial and anti-Christian maxims into the veins of the people before they became
American citizens. Unfortunately, the Jesuits and the nuns have in great part remained the teachers of
those people since. They have continued in a silent, but most efficacious way, to spread their hatred
against our institutions, our laws, our schools, our rights and our liberties in such a way that this terrible
conflict became unavoidable between the North and the South. As I told you before, it is to Popery that
we owe this terrible civil war.

"I would have laughed at the man who would have told me that before I became the President. But
Professor Morse has opened my eyes on that subject. And now I see that mystery; I understand that
engineering of hell which, though not seen or even suspected by the country, is putting in motion the
large, heavy, and noisy wheels of the state cars of the Southern Confederacy. Our people is not yet ready
to learn and believe those things, and perhaps it is not the proper time to initiate them to those dark
mysteries of hell; it would throw oil on a fire which is already sufficiently destructive.

"You are almost the only one with whom I speak freely on that subject. But sooner or later the nation
will know the real origin of those rivers of blood and tears, which are spreading desolation and death
everywhere. And then those who have caused those desolations and disasters will be called to give an
account of them.

"I do not pretend to be a prophet.But though not a prophet, I see a very dark cloud on our horizon. And
that dark cloud is coming from Rome. It is filled with tears of blood. It will rise and increase till its
flanks will be torn by a flash of lightning, followed by a fearful peal of thunder. Then a cyclone, such as
the world has never seen, will pass over this country, spreading ruin and desolation from north to south.
After it is over, there will be long days of peace and prosperity: for Popery, with its Jesuits and merciless
Inquisition, will have been for ever swept away from our country. Neither I nor you, but our children,
will see those things."

Many of those who approached Abraham Lincoln felt that there was a prophetic spirit in him, and that
he was continually walking and acting with the thought of God in his mind, and only in view to do His
will and work for His glory. Speaking of the slaves, he said one day before the members of his cabinet:

"I have not decided against a proclamation of liberty to the slaves, but I hold the matter under
advisement. And I can assure you that the subject is on my mind, by day and by night, more than any
other. Whatever shall appear to be God's will, I will do."*

A few days before that proclamation, he said, before several of his counselors: "I made a solemn vow
before God that if General Lee was driven back from Pennsylvania, I would crown the result by the
declaration of freedom to the slaves."**

But I would have volumes to write, instead of a short chapter, were I to give all the facts I have collected
of the sincere and profound piety of Abraham Lincoln.

I cannot, however, omit his admirable and solemn act of faith in the eternal justice of God, as expressed
in the closing words of his last inaugural address of the 4th of March, 1865.

"Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet,
if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's 520 years of unrequited toil
shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn by the lash shall be paid by another drawn by the
sword, as we said 3,000 years ago, so still it must be said: The judgments of the Lord are true and
righteous altogether."

These sublime words, falling from the lips of the greatest Christian whom God ever put at the head of a
nation, only a few days before his martyrdom, sent a thrill of wonder through the whole world. The
Godfearing people and the upright of every nation listened to them as if they had just come from the
golden harp of David. Even the infidels remain mute with admiration and awe. It seemed to all that the
echoes of heaven and earth were repeating that last hymn, falling from the heart of the noblest and truest
Gospel man of our days: "The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether" (Psalm xix. 9).

The 6th of April, 1865, President Lincoln was invited by General Grant to enter Richmond, the capital
of the rebel states, which he had just captured. The ninth, the beaten army of Lee, surrounded by the
victorious legions of the soldiers of Liberty, were forced to lay down their arms and their banners at the
feet of the generals of Lincoln. The tenth, the victorious President addressed an immense multitude of
the citizens of Washington, to invite them to thank God and the armies for the glorious victories of the
last few days, and for the blessed peace which was to follow these five years of slaughter.

But he was on the top of the mountain of Pisgah, and though he had fervently prayed that he might cross
the Jordan and enter with his people into the Land of Promise, after which he had so often sighed, he
was not to see his request granted. The answer had come from heaven, "You will not cross the Jordan,
and you will not enter that Promised Land, which is there, so near. You must die for your nation's sake!"
The lips, the heart, and the soul of the New Moses were still repeating the sublime words, "The
judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether," when the Jesuit assassin, Booth, murdered him,
the 14th of April, 1865, at ten o'clock p.m.

Let us hear the eloquent historian, Abbot, on that sad event: "In the midst of unparalleled success, and
while all the bells of the land were ringing with joy, a calamity fell upon us which overwhelmed the
country in consternation and awe. On Friday evening, April 14th, President Lincoln attended Ford's
Theater, in Washington. He was sitting quietly in his box, listening to the drama, when a man entered
the door of the lobby leading to the box, closing the door behind him. Drawing near to the President, he
drew from his pocket a small pistol, and shot him in the back of the head. As the President fell, senseless
and mortally wounded, and the shriek of his wife, who was seated at his side, pierced every ear, the
assassin leaped from the box, a perpendicular height of nine feet, and as he rushed across the stage, bare-
headed, brandished a dagger, exclaiming, 'Sic semper tyrannis!' and disappeared behind the side scenes.
There was a moment of silent consternation. Then ensued a scene of confusion which it is in vain to
attempt to describe.

"The dying President was taken into a house near by, and placed upon a bed. What a scene did that room
present! The chief of a mighty nation lay there, senseless, drenched in blood, his brains oozing from his
wound! Sumner, Farwell, and Colfax and Stanton, and many others were there, filled with grief and

"The surgeon, General Barnes, solemnly examined the wound. There was silence as of the grave, the life
and death of the nation seemed dependent on the result. General Barnes looked up sadly and said, 'The
wound is mortal!'

"'Oh! No! General, no! no!' cried out Secretary Stanton, and sinking into a chair, he covered his face and
wept like a child. Senator Sumner tenderly held the head of the unconscious martyr.

"Though all unused to weep, he sobs as though his great heat would break. In his anguish, his head falls
upon the blood-stained pillow, and his black locks blend with those of the dying victim, which care and
toil has rendered gray, and which blood has crimsoned. What a scene! Sumner, who had lingered
through months of agony, having himself been stricken down by he bludgeon of slavery, now sobbing
and fainting in anguish over the prostrate form of his friend, whom slavery had slain! This vile rebellion,
after deluging the land in blood, has culminated in a crime which appalls all nations.

"Nobel Abraham, true descendant of the father of the faithful; honest in every trust, humble as a child,
tender-hearted as a woman, who could not bear to injure even his most envenomed foes: who, in the
hour of triumph, was saddened lest the feelings of his adversaries should be wounded by their defeat,
with 'charity of all, malice towards none,' endowed with 'common sense,' intelligence never surpassed,
and with power of intellect which enabled him to grapple with the most gigantic opponents in debates,
developing abilities as a statesman, which won the gratitude of his country and the admiration of the
world, and with graces and amiability which drew to him all generous hearts; dies by the bullet of the

But who was that assassin? Booth was nothing but a tool of the Jesuits. It was Rome who directed his
arm, after corrupting his heart and damning his soul.

After I had mixed my tears with those of the grand country of my adoption, I fell on my knees and asked
my God to grant me to show to the world what I knew to be the truth, viz., that that horrible crime was
the work of popery. And, after twenty years of constant and most difficult researches, I came fearlessly
today before the American people, to say and prove that the President, Abraham Lincoln, was
assassinated by the priests and the Jesuits of Rome.

In the book of the testimonies given in the prosecution of the assassin of Lincoln, published by Ben
Pitman, and in the two volumes of the trial of John Surratt, in 1867, we have the legal and irrefutable
proof that the plot of the assassins of Lincoln was matured, if not started, in the house of Mary Surratt,
No. 561, H. Street, Washington City, D.C. But who were living in that house, and who were visiting that
family? The legal answer says: "The most devoted Catholics in the city!" The sworn testimonies show
more than that. They show that it was the common rendezvous of the priests of Washington. Several
priests swear that they were going there "sometimes," and when pressed to answer what they meant by
"sometimes," they were not sure if it was not once a week or once a month. One of them, less on his
guard, swore that he seldom passed before that house without entering; and he said he never passed less
than once a week. The devoted Roman Catholic (an apostate from Protestantism) called L.J. Weichman,
who was himself living in that house, swears that Father Wiget was very often in that house, and Father
Lahiman swears that he was living with Mrs. Surratt in the same house! * * *

What does the presence of so many priests in that house reveal to the world? No man of common sense,
who knows anything about the priests of Rome, can entertain any doubt that, not only they knew all that
was going on inside those walls, but that they were the advisers, the counselors, the very soul of that
infernal plot. Why did Rome keep one of her priests, under that roof, from morning till night and from
night till morning? Why did she send many others, almost every day of the week, into that dark nest of
plotters against the very existence of the great republic, and against the life of her President, her
principal generals and leading men, if it were not to be the advisers, the rulers, the secret motive power
of the infernal plot.

No one, if he is not an idiot, will think and say that those priests, who were the personal friends and the
father confessors of Booth, John Surratt, Mrs. and Misses Surratt, could be constantly there without
knowing what was going on, particularly when we know that every one of those priests was a rabid rebel
in heart. Every one of those priests, knowing that his infallible Pope had called Jeff Davis his dear son,
and had taken the Southern Confederacy under his protection, was bound to believe that the most holy
thing a man could do, was to fight for the Southern cause, by destroying those who were its enemies.

Read the history of the assassination of Admiral Coligny, Henry III. and Henry IV., and William the
Taciturn, by the hired assassins of the Jesuits; compare them with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln,
and you will find that one resembles the others as one drop of water resembles another. You will
understand that they all come from the same source, Rome!

In all those murders, you will find that the murderers, selected and trained by the Jesuits, were of the
most exalted Roman Catholic piety, living in the company of priests, going to confess very often,
receiving the communion the day before, if not the very day of the murder. You will see in all those
horrible deeds of hell, prepared behind the dark walls of the holy inquisition, that the assassins were
considering themselves as the chosen instruments of God, to save the nations by striking its tyrant; that
they firmly believed that there was no sin in killing the enemy of the people of the holy church, and of
the infallible Pope!

Compare the last hours of the Jesuit Ravaillac, the assassin of Henry IV., who absolutely refuses to
repent, though suffering the most horrible torture on the rack, with Booth, who suffering also the most
horrible tortures from is broken leg, writes in his daily memorandum, the very day before his death: "I
can never repent, though we hated to kill. Our country owed all her troubles to him (Lincoln), and God
simply made me the instrument of his punishment."*

Yes! Compare the bloody deeds of those two assassins, and you will see that they had been trained in the
same school; they had been taught by the same teachers. Evidently the Jesuit Ravaillac, calling all the
saints of heaven to his help, at his last hour; and Booth pressing the medal of the Virgin Mary on his
breast, when falling mortally wounded,** are both coming out of the same Jesuit mould.

Who has lost his common sense enough to suppose that it was Jeff Davis who had filled the mind and
the heart of Booth with that religious and so exalted fanaticism! Surely Jeff Davis has promised the
money to reward the assassins and nerve their arms, by the hope of becoming rich.The testimonies on
that account say that he had promised one million dollars.***

That arch-rebel could give the money; but the Jesuits alone could select the assassins, train them, and
show them a crown of glory in heaven, if they would kill the author of the bloodshed, the famous
renegade and apostate the enemy of the Pope and of the Church Lincoln.

Who does not see the lessons given by the Jesuits to Booth, in their daily intercourse in Mary Surratt's
house, when he reads those lines written by Booth a few hours before his death: "I can never repent;
God made me the instrument of His punishment!" Compare these words with the doctrines and
principles taught by the councils, the decrees of the Pope, and the laws of holy inquisition, as you find
them in Chapter LIX. of this volume, and you will find that the sentiments and belief of Booth flow
from those principles, as the river flows from its source.

And that pious Miss Surratt who, the very next day after the murder of Lincoln, said, without being
rebuked, in the presence of several other witnesses: "The death of Abraham Lincoln is no more than the
death of any nigger in the army" where did she get that maxim, if not from her church? Had not that
church recently proclaimed, through her highest legal and civil authority, the devoted Roman Catholic
Judge Taney, in his Dred Scot decision, the Negroes have no right, which the white is bound to respect!
By bringing the President on a level with the lowest nigger, Rome was saying that he had no right even
to his life; for this was the maxim of the rebel priests, who, everywhere, had made themselves the
echoes of the sentence of their distinguished co-religionist Taney.

It was from the very lips of the priests, who were constantly coming in and going out of their house, that
those young ladies had learned those anti-social and anti-Christian doctrines. Read in the testimony
concerning Mrs. Mary E. Surratt (pp. 122, 123), how the Jesuits had perfectly drilled her in the art of
perjuring herself. In the very moment when the government officer orders her to prepare herself, with
her daughter, to follow him as prisoner, at about ten p.m., Payne, the would-be murderer of Seward,
knocks at the door and wants to see Mrs. Surratt. But instead of having Mrs. Surratt to open the door, he
finds himself confronted, face to face, with the government detective, Major Smith, who swears:

"I questioned him in regard to his occupation, and what business he had at the house at this late hour of
the night. He stated that he was a labourer, and had come to dig a gutter at the request of Mrs. Surratt.

"I went to the parlour door, and said, 'Mrs. Surratt, will you step here a minute?' She came out, and I
asked her, 'Do you know this man, and did you hire him to come and dig a gutter for you?' She
answered, raising her right hand, 'Before God, sir, I do not know this man; I have never seen him, and I
did not hire him to dig a gutter for me.'"*

But it was proved after, by several unimpeachable witnesses, that she knew very well that Payne was a
personal friend of her son, who, many times, had come to her house, in company of his friend and pet,
Booth. She had received the communion just two or three days before that public perjury. Just a moment
after making it, the officer ordered her to step out into the carriage. But before doing it, she asked
permission to kneel down and pray; which was granted.**

I ask it from any man of common sense, could Jeff Davis have imparted such a religious calm and self-
possession to that woman when her hands were just reddened with the blood of the President, and she
was on her way to trial!

No! such sang froid, such calm in that soul, in such a terrible and solemn hour, could come only from
the teachings of those Jesuits who, for more than six months, were in her house, showing her a crown of
eternal glory if she could help to kill the monster, apostate Lincoln the only cause of that horrible civil
war! There is not the least doubt that the priests had perfectly succeeded in persuading Mary Surratt and
Booth that the killing of Lincoln was a most holy and deserving work, for which God had an eternal
reward in store.

There is a fact to which the American people have not yet given a sufficient attention. It is that, without
a single exception, the conspirators were Roman Catholics. The learned and great patriot, General
Baker, in his admirable report, struck and bewildered by that strange, mysterious and portentous fact,

"I mention, as an exceptional and remarkable fact, that every conspirator, in custody, is by education a

But those words which, if well understood by the United States, would have thrown so much light on the
true causes of their untold and unspeakable disasters, fell as if on the ears of deaf men. Very few, if any,
paid attention to them. As General Baker says, all the conspirators were attending Catholic Church
services and were educated Roman Catholics. It is true that some of them, as Atzeroth, Payne and
Harold, asked for Protestant ministers, when they were to be hung. But they had been considered, till
then, as converts to Romanism. At page 437 of The Trial of John Surratt, Louis Weichman tells us that
he was going to St. Aloysin's Church with Atzeroth, and that it was there that he introduced him to Mr.
Brothy (another Roman Catholic).

It is a well authenticated fact, that Booth and Weichman, who were themselves Protestant perverts to
Romanism, had proselytized a good number of semi-Protestants and infidels who, either from
conviction, or from hope of the fortunes promised to the successful murderers, were themselves very
zealous for the Church of Rome. Payne, Atzeroth and Harold, were among those proselytes. But when
those murderers were to appear before the country, and receive the just punishment of their crime, the
Jesuits were too shrewd to ignore that if they were all coming on the scaffold as Roman Catholics, and
accompanied by their father confessors, it would, at once, open the eyes of the American people, and
clearly show that this was a Roman Catholic plot. They persuaded three of their proselytes to avail
themselves of the theological principles of the Church of Rome, that a man is allowed to conceal his
religion, nay, that he may say that he is a heretic, a Protestant, though he is a Roman Catholic, when it is
for his own interest or the best interests of his church to conceal the truth and deceive the people. Here is
the doctrine of Rome on that subject.

"It is often more to the glory of God and the good of our neighbour to cover the faith than to confess it;
for example, if concealed among heretics, you may accomplish a greater amount of good; of if, by
declaring our religion more of evil would follow for example, great trouble, death, the hostility of a

It is evident that the Jesuits had never had better reasons to suspect that the declaration of their religion
would damage them and excite the wrath of their tyrant, viz., the American people. Lloyds, in whose
house Mrs. Surratt concealed the carbine which Booth wanted for protection, when just after the murder
he was to flee towards the Southern States, was a firm Roman Catholic. Dr. Mudd, at whose place Booth
stopped, to have his broken leg dressed, was a Roman Catholic, and so was Garrett, in whose barn Booth
was caught and killed. Why so? Because, as Jeff Davis was the only man to pay one million dollars to
those who would kill Abraham Lincoln, the Jesuits were the only men to select the murderers and
prepare everything to protect them after their diabolical deed, and such murderers could not be found
except among their blind and fanatical slaves.

The great, he fatal mistake of the American Government in the prosecution of the assassins of Abraham
Lincoln was to constantly keep out of sight the religious element of that terrible drama. Nothing would
have been more easy, then, than to find out the complicity of the priests, who were not only coming
every week and every day, but who were even living in that den of murderers. But this was carefully
avoided from the beginning to the end of the trial. When, not long after the execution of the murderers, I
went, incognito, to Washington to begin my investigation about its true and real authors, I was not a
little surprised to see that not a single one of the Government men to whom I addressed myself, would
consent to have any talk with me on that matter, except after I had given my word of honour that I would
never mention their names in connection with the result of my investigation. I saw, with a profound
distress, that the influence of Rome was almost supreme in Washington. I could not find a single
statesman who would dare to face that nefarious influence and fight it down.

Several of the government men in whom I had more confidence, told me: "We had not the least doubt
that the Jesuits were at the bottom of that great iniquity; we even feared, sometimes, that this would
come out so clearly before the military tribunal, that there would be no possibility of keeping it out of
the public sight. This was not through cowardice, as you think, but through a wisdom which you ought
to approve, if you cannot admire it. Had we been in days of peace, we know that with a little more
pressure on the witnesses, many priests would have been compromised; for Mrs. Surratt's house was
their common rendezvous; it is more than probable that several of them might have been hung. But the
civil war was hardly over. The Confederacy, though broken down, was still living in millions of hearts;
murderers and formidable elements of discord were still seen everywhere, to which the hanging or
exiling of those priests would have given a new life. Riots after riots would have accompanied and
followed their execution. We thought we had had enough of blood, fires, devastations and bad feelings.
We were all longing after days of peace: the country was in need of them. We concluded that the best
interests of humanity was to punish only those who were publicly and visibly guilty; that the verdict
might receive the approbation of all, without creating any new bad feelings. Allow us also tell you that
this policy was that of our late President. For you know it well, there was nothing which that good and
great man feared so much as to arm the Protestants against the Catholics, and the Catholics against the

But if any one has still any doubts of the complicity of the Jesuits in the murder of Abraham Lincoln, let
him give a moment of attention to the following facts, and their doubts will be for ever removed. It is
only from the very Jesuit accomplices' lips that I take my sworn testimonies.

It is evident that a very elaborate plan of escape had been prepared by the priests of Rome to save the
lives of the assassins and the conspirators. It would be too long to follow all the murderers when, Cain-
like, they were fleeing in every direction, to escape the vengeance of God and man. Let us fix our eyes
on John Surratt, who was in Washington the 14th of April, helping Booth in the perpetration of the
assassination. Who will take care of him? Who will protect and conceal him? Who will press him on
their bosom, put their mantles on his shoulders to conceal him from the just vengeance of the human and
divine laws? The priest, Charles Boucher,* swears that only a few days after the murder, John Surratt
was sent to him by Father Lapierre, of Montreal; that he kept him concealed in his parsonage of St.
Liboire from the end of April to the end of July, then he took him back, secretly, to Father Lapierre, who
kept him secreted in his own father's house, under the very shadow of the Montreal bishop's palace. He
swears** that Father Lapierre visited him (Surratt) often, when secreted at St. Liboire, and that he
(Father Boucher) visited him, at least, twice a week, from the end of July to September, when concealed
in Father Lapierre's house in Montreal.

That same father, Charles Boucher, swears that he accompanied John Surratt in a carriage, in the
company of Father Lapierre, to the steamer "Montreal," when starting for Quebec: that Father Lapaierre
kept him (John Surratt) under lock during the voyage from Montreal to Quebec, and that he
accompanied him, disguised from the Montreal steamer to the ocean steamer, "Peruvian."*

The doctor of the steamer "Peruvian," L.I.A. McMillan, swears** that Father Lapierre introduced him to
John Surratt under the false name of McCarthy, whom he was keeping locked in his state room, and
whom he conducted disguised to the ocean steamer "Peruvian," and with whom he remained till she left
Quebec for Europe, the 15th September, 1865.

But who is that Father Lapierre who takes such a tender, I dare say a paternal care of Surratt? It is not
less a personage than the canon of Bishop Bourget, of Montreal. He is the confidential man of the
bishop; he lives with the bishop, eats at his table, assists him with his counsel, and has to receive his
advice in every step of life. According to the laws of Rome, the canons are to the bishop what the arms
are to the body.

Now, I ask: Is it not evident that the bishops and the priests of Washington have trusted this murderer to
the care of the bishops and priests of Montreal, that they might conceal, feed, and protect him for nearly
six months, under the very shadow of the bishops palace? Would they have done that if they were not
his accomplices? Why did they so continually remain with him day and night, if they were not in fear
that he might compromise them by an indiscreet word? Why do we see those priests (I ought to say,
those two ambassadors and anointed representatives of the Pope), alone in the carriage which takes that
great culprit from his house of concealment to the steamer? Why do they keep him there, under lock, till
they transfer him, under a disguised name, to the ocean steamer, the "Peruvian," on the 15th July, 1865?
Why such tender sympathies for that stranger? Why going through such trouble and expense for that
young American among the bishops and priests of Canada? There is only one answer. He was one of
their tools, one of their selected men to strike the great Republic of Equality and Liberty to the heart. For
more than six months before the murder, the priests had lodged, eaten, conversed, slept with him under
the same roof in Washington. They had trained him to his deed of blood, by promising him protection on
earth, and a crown of glory in heaven, if he would only be true to their designs to the end. And he had
been true to the end.

Now the great crime is accomplished! Lincoln is murdered! Jeff Davis, the dear son of the Pope, is
avenged! The great Republic has been struck to the heart! The soldiers of Liberty all over the world are
weeping over the dead form of the one who had led them to victory: a cry of desolation goes from earth
to heaven.

It seems as if we heard the death-knell of the cause of freedom, equality and fraternity among men. It
was many centuries since the implacable enemies of the rights and liberties of men had struck such a
giant foe: their joy was as great as their victory complete.

But do you see that man fleeing from Washington towards the north? He has the mark of Cain on his
forehead, his hands are reddened with blood, he is pale and trembling, for he knows it; a whole outraged
nation is after him for her just vengeance; he hears the thundering voice of God: "Where is thy brother?"
Where will he find a refuge? Where, outside of hell, will he meet friends to shelter and save him from
the just vengeance of God and men?

Oh! He has sure refuge in the arms of that church who, for more than a thousand years, is crying: "Death
to all the heretics! death to all the soldiers of Liberty!" He has devoted friends among the very men who,
after having prepared the massacre of Admiral Coligny, and his 75,000 Protestant countrymen, rang the
bells of Rome to express their joy when they heard that, at last, the King of France had slaughtered them

But where will those bishops and priests of Canada send John Surratt when they find it impossible to
conceal him any longer from the thousands of detectives of the United States, who are ransacking
Canada to find out his retreat? Who will conceal, feed, lodge, and protect him after the priests of Canada
pressed his hand for the last time on board of the "Peruvian," the 15th of September, 1865?

Who can have any doubt about that? Who can suppose that any one but the Pope himself and his Jesuits
will protect the murderer of Abraham Lincoln in Europe?

If you want to see him after he has crossed the ocean, go to Vitry, at the door of Rome, and there you
will find him enrolled under the banners of the Pope, in the 9th company of his Zouaves, under the false
name of Watson. Of course, the Pope was forced to withdraw his protection over him, after the
Government of the United States had found him there, and he was brought back to Washington to be

But on his arrival as a prisoner in the United States, his Jesuit father confessor whispered in his ear:
"Fear not, you will not be condemned! Through the influence of a high Roman Catholic lady, two or
three of the jurymen will be Roman Catholics, and you will be safe."

Those who have read the two volumes of the trial of John Surratt know that never more evident proofs
of guilt were brought against a murderer than in that case. But the Roman Catholic jurymen had read the
theology of St. Thomas, a book which the Pope has ordered to be taught in every college, academy, and
university of Rome, they had learned that it is the duty of the Roman Catholics to exterminate all the

They had read the decree of the Councils of Constance, that no faith was to be kept with heretics. They
had read in the Council of Lateran that the Catholics who arm themselves for the extermination of
heretics, have all their sins forgiven, and receive the same blessings as those who go and fight for the
rescue of the Holy Land.

Those jurymen were told by their father confessors that the most holy father, the Pope, Gregory VII.,
had solemnly and infallibly declared that "the killing of an heretic was no murder." Jure Canonico.

After such teachings, how could the Roman Catholic jurymen find John Surratt guilty of murder for
killing the heretic Lincoln? The jury having disagreed, no verdict could be given. The Government was
forced to let the murderer go unpunished.

But when the irreconcilable enemies of all the rights and liberties of men were congratulating
themselves on their successful efforts to save the life of John Surratt, the God of heaven was stamping
again on their faces the mark of murder, in such a way that all eyes will see it.

"Murder will out," is a truth repeated by all nations from the beginning of the world. It is the knowledge
of that truth which has sustained me in my long and difficult researches of the true authors of the
assassination of Lincoln, and which enables me today to present to the world a fact, which seems almost
miraculous, to show the complicity of the priests of Rome in the murder of the martyred President.

Some time ago, I providentially met the Rev. Mr. R. A. Conwell, at Chicago. Having known that I was
in search of the facts about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, he told me he knew one of those facts
which might perhaps throw some light on the subject of my researches.

"The very day of the murder," he said, "he was in the Roman Catholic village of St. Joseph, Minnesota
State, when, at about six o'clock in the afternoon, he was told by a Roman Catholic of the place, who
was a purveyor for a great number of priests who lived in that town, where they have a monastery, that
the State Secretary Seward and President Lincoln had just been killed. This was told me," he said, "in
the presence of a most respectable gentlemen, called Bennett, who was not less puzzled than me. As
there were no railroad lines nearer than forty miles, nor telegraph offices nearer than eighty miles from
that place, we could not see how such news was spread in that town. The next day, the 15th of April, I
was at St. Cloud, a town about twelve miles distant, where there were neither railroad nor telegraph; I
said to several people that I had been told in the priestly village of St. Joseph, by a Roman Catholic, that
Abraham Lincoln and the Secretary Seward had been assassinated. They answered me that they had
heard nothing about it. But the next Sabbath, the 16th of April, when going to the church of St. Cloud, to
preach, a friend gave me a copy of a telegram sent to him on the Saturday, reporting that Abraham
Lincoln and Secretary Seward had been assassinated the very day before, which was Friday, the 14th, at
10 p.m. But how could the Roman Catholic purveyor of the priests of St. Joseph have told me the same
thing, before several witnesses, just four hours before its occurrence? I spoke of that strange thing to
many that same day, and, the very next day, I wrote to the St. Paul 'Press' under the heading of 'a strange
coincidence.' Some time later, the editor of the St. Paul 'Pioneer,' having denied what I had written on
that subject, I addressed him the following note, which he had printed, and which I have kept. Here it is,
you may keep it as an infallible proof of my veracity.

"You assume the non-truth of a short paragraph furnished by me to the St. Paul 'Press,' viz:


"At 6:30 p.m., Friday last, April 14th, I was told as an item of news, eight miles west of this place, that
Lincoln and Seward had been assassinated. This was three hours after I had heard the news."

"St. Cloud, 17th of April, 1865.

"The integrity of history requires that the above coincidence be established. And if anyone calls it in
question, then proofs more ample than reared their sanguinary shadows to comfort a traitor can now be

"F. A. Conwell."
I asked that gentleman if he would be kind enough to give me the fact under oath, that I might make use
of it in the report I intended to publish about the assassination of Lincoln. And he kindly granted my
request in the following form:-
State of Illinois,
Cook County. s,s.

Rev. F. A. Conwell being sworn, deposes and says that he is seventy-one years old, that he is resident of
North Evanston, in Cook County, State of Illinois, that he has been in the ministry for fifty-six years,
and is now one of the chaplains of the "Seamen's Bethel Home," in Chicago; that he was chaplain of the
1st Minnesota Regiment, in the war of the rebellion. That, on the 14th day of April, A.D. 1865, he was
in St. Joseph, Minnesota, and reached there so early as six o'clock in the evening, in company with Mr.
Bennett, who, then and now, is a resident of St. Cloud, Minnesota. That on that date, there was no
telegraph nearer than Minneapolis, about eighty miles from St. Joseph; and there was no railroad
communication nearer than Avoka, Minnesota, about forty miles distant. That when he reached St.
Joseph, on the 14th day of April, 1865, one Mr. Linneman, who then kept the hotel of St. Joseph, told
affiant that President Lincoln and Secretary Seward were assassinated, that it was not later than half-past
six o'clock, on Friday, April 14th, 1865, when Mr. Linneman told me this. Shortly thereafter, Mr.
Bennett came in the hotel, and I told him that Mr. Linneman said the President Lincoln and Secretary
Seward were assassinated; and then, the same Mr. Linneman reported the same conversation to Mr.
Bennett in my presence. That during that time, Mr. Linneman told me that he had the charge of the friary
or college for young men, under the priests, who were studying for the priesthood of St. Joseph. That
there was a large multitude of this kind at St. Joseph, at this time. Affiant says that, on Saturday
morning, April 15th, 1865, he went to St. Cloud, a distance of about ten miles, and reached there about
eight o'clock in the morning. That there was no railroad or telegraph communication to St. Cloud. When
he arrived at St. Cloud, he told Mr. Haworth, the hotel keeper, that he had been told that President
Lincoln and Secretary Seward had been assassinated, and asked if it was true. He further told Henry
Clay, Wait, Charles Gilman, who was afterwards Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota, and Rev. Mr. Tice,
the same thing, and inquired of them if they had any such news; and they replied that they had not heard
anything of the kind.

Affiant says that, on Sunday morning, April 16th, 1865, he preached in St. Cloud, and on the way to the
church, a copy of telegram was handed him, stating that the President and Secretary were assassinated
Friday evening at about nine o'clock. This telegram has been brought to St. Cloud by Mr. Gorton, who
had reached St. Cloud by stage; and this was the first intelligence that had reached St. Cloud of the

Affiant says further that on Monday morning, April 17th, 1865, he furnished the "Press," a paper of St.
Paul, a statement that three hours before the event took place, he had been informed at St. Joseph,
Minnesota, that the President had been assassinated, and this was published in the "Press."
Francis Asbury Conwell.

Subscribed and sworn to be Francis A. Conwell, before me, a Notary Public of Kankakee County,
Illinois, at Chicago, Cook County, this 6th day of September, 1883.

Stephen R. Moore, Notary Public.

Though this document was very important and precious to me, I felt that it would be much more
valuable if it could be corroborated by the testimonies of Messrs. Bennett and Linneman, themselves,
and I immediately sent a magistrate to find out if they were still living, and if they remembered the facts
of the sworn declaration of Rev. Mr. Conwell. By the good providence of God, both of these gentlemen
were found living, and both gave the following testimonies:
State of Minnesota,
Sterns County, City of St. Cloud.

Horace P. Bennett, being sworn, deposes and says that he is aged sixtyfour years; that he is a resident of
St. Cloud, Minnesota, and has resided in this county since 1856; that he is acquainted with the Rev. F.
A. Conwell, who was chaplain of the 1st Minnesota Regiment in the war of the rebellion; that on the
14th of April, 1865, he was in St. Joseph, Minnesota, in company with Mr. Francis A. Conwell; that
they reached St. Joseph about sundown on said April 14th; that there was no railroad or telegraph
communication with St. Joseph, at that time, nor nearer than Avoka, about forty miles distant. That
affiant, on reaching the hotel kept by Mr. Linneman, went to the barn while Rev. F. A. Conwell entered
the hotel; and shortly afterwards, affiant had returned to the hotel, Mr. Conwell told him that Mr.
Linneman had reported to him the assassination of President Lincoln; that Linneman was present and
substantiated the statement.

That on Saturday morning, April 15th, affiant and Rev. Conwell came to St. Cloud and reported that
they had been told at St. Joseph about the assassination of President Lincoln, that no one at St. Cloud
had heard of the event at this time, that the first news of the event which reached St. Cloud was on
Sunday morning, April 16th, when the news was brought by Leander Gorton, who had just come up
from Avoka, Minnesota; that they spoke to several persons of St. Cloud, concerning the matter, when
they reached there, on Sunday morning, but affiant does not now remember who those different persons
were, and further affiant says not.

Horace P. Bennett.

Sworn before me, and subscribed in my presence, this 18th day of October, A.D. 1883.

Andrew C. Robertson, Notary Public.
Mr. Linneman having refused to swear on his written declaration, which I have in my possession, I take
only from it what refers to the principal fact, viz, that three or four hours before Lincoln was
assassinated at Washington, the 14th of April, 1865, the fact was told as already accomplished, in the
priestly village of St. Joseph, Minnesota.
"He (Linneman) remembers the time that Messrs. Conwell and Bennett came to this place (St. Joseph,
Minnesota) on Friday evening, before the President was killed, and he asked them, if they had heard he
was dead, and they replied they had not. He heard this rumour in his store from people who came in and
out. But he cannot remember from whom.

"J. H. Linneman.
"October 20th, 1883."

I present here to the world a fact of the greatest gravity, and that fact is so well authenticated that it
cannot allow even the possibility of a doubt.

Three or four hours before Lincoln was murdered in Washington, the 14th of April, 1865, that murder
was not only known by some one, but it was circulated and talked of in the streets, and in the houses of
the priestly and Romish town of St. Joseph, Minnesota. The fact is undeniable; the testimonies are
unchallengeable: and there were no railroad nor any telegraph communications nearer than forty or
eighty miles from the nearest station to St. Joseph.
Naturally every one asked: "How could such news spread? Where is the source of such a rumour?" Mr.
Linneman, who is a Roman Catholic, tells us that though he heard this from many in his store, and in the
streets, he does not remember the name of a single one who told him that. And when we hear this from
him, we understand why he did not dare to swear upon it, and shrank from the idea of perjuring himself.
For every one feels that his memory cannot be so poor as that, when he remembers so well the names of
the two strangers, Messrs. Conwell and Bennett, to whom he had announced the assassination of
Lincoln, just seventeen years before. But if the memory of Mr. Linneman is so deficient on that subject,
we can help him, and tell him with mathematical accuracy:

"You got the news from your priests of St. Joseph! The conspiracy which cost the life of the martyred
President was prepared by the priests of Washington, in the house of Mary Surratt, No. 541, H. Street.
The priests of St. Joseph were often visiting Washington, and boarding, probably, at Mrs. Surrat's, as the
priests of Washington were often visiting their brother priests at St. Joseph. Those priests of Washington
were in daily communication with their co-rebel priests of St. Joseph; they were their intimate friends.
There were no secrets among them, as there are no secrets among priests. They are the members of the
same body, the branches of the same tree. The details of the murder, as the day selected for its
commission, were as well known among the priests of St. Joseph, as they were among those of
Washington. The death of Lincoln was such a glorious event for those priests! That infamous apostate,
Lincoln, who, baptized in the Holy Church, had rebelled against her, broken his oath of allegiance to the
Pope, taken the very day of his baptism, and lived the life of an apostate! That infamous Lincoln, who
had dared to fight against the Confederacy of the South after the Vicar of Christ had solemnly declared
that their cause was just, legitimate and holy! That bloody tyrant, that godless and infamous man, was to
receive, at last, the just chastisement of his crimes, the 14th of April! What glorious news!"

How could the priests conceal such a joyful event from their bosom friend, Mr. Linneman? He was their
confidential man: he was their purveyor: he was their right hand man among the faithful of St. Joseph.
They thought that they would be guilty of a want of confidence in their bosom friend, if they did not tell
him all about the glorious event of that great day. But, of course, they requested him not to mention their
names, if he would spread the joyful news among the devoted Roman Catholics who almost exclusively,
formed the people of St. Joseph. Mr. Linneman has honourably and faithfully kept his promise never to
reveal their names, and today, we have in our hand, the authentic testimonies signed by him that, though
some body, the 14th of April, told him that President Lincoln was assassinated, he does not know who
told him that!

But there is not a man of sound judgment who will have any doubt about that fact, the 14th of April,
1865, the priests of Rome knew and circulated the death of Lincoln four hours before its occurrence in
their Roman Catholic town of St. Joseph, Minnesota. But they could not circulate it without knowing it,
and they could not know it, without belonging to the band of conspirators who assassinated President

Sunday, 25 November 2012




liberty.jpg (28733 bytes)
What is the history and origin of the famed "Statue of Liberty"?
Is it so innocent as millions assume? There is much more to this
story than most believe. It is time we pulled aside the cloak, and
took a good look at the real facts, and what they mean for us,
today. You might be shocked to know the deception that has
been pulled over the eyes of the American people!

It is very interesting that the great symbol that is situated in the harbor of New York City, the Statue of Liberty, is a woman carrying NIMRODS torch.

Statue of Liberty and Nimrod

Statue of Liberty
The statue, a gift to the United States from the people of France, is of a robed female figure representing Libertas, the Roman (false) goddess of freedom. Who is "Libertas"?

She is Semiramis - Babylonian Ishtar (Easter) = Ashtaroth = Whore of Babylon = Aphrodite = Libertas = the Statue of Liberty!

Semiramis became known as "Ishtar" which is pronounced "Easter", and her moon egg became known as "Ishtar's" egg."

Baal = Sungod (false idol) = Babbler = Tower of Babel = Nimrod
Judges 2:13 "And they forsook the LORD, and served Baal and Ashtaroth."
2 Kings 23:5 "And he put down the idolatrous priests, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places in the cities of Judah, and in the places round about Jerusalem; them also that burned incense unto Baal, to the sun, and to the moon, and to the planets, and to all the host of heaven."

Nimrod's father Cush, married a woman named Semiramis. She was both the wife and mother of Nimrod; she was an evil woman, indeed. Nimrod and his mother wife ) led a great rebellion against GOD. The Tower of Babel was the first "United Nations*" and "New World Order". It was Satan's attempt to defy GOD and His authority. Nimrod was thought to have been the first post-flood world emperor, recorded in history as the Assyrian King Tukulti-Ninurta I, the founder of Nineveh and ruler of the known world within the Golden Crescent.
"Nimrod" comes from the Hebrew word, "Marad", and it means "to rebel". When given in the first person, plural, it reads "Jussive", meaning "we will rebel". There is much written of Nimrod by ancient writers and Josephus wrote "Nimrod persuaded mankind not to ascribe their happiness to God, but to think that his own excellency was the source of it. And he soon changed things into a tyranny, thinking there was no other way to wean men from the fear of God, than by making them rely upon his own power."

Roman historian, Ammianus Marcellinus, credits Semiramis as the first person to castrate a male youth into eunuch-hood: "Semiramis, that ancient queen who was the first person to castrate male youths of tender age." Zeus or Chus or Cush was often called Zeus the Aethiops or Zeus the Serpent king. Nimrod worshiped his father, satan, which he also called master the great Serpent and held his flesh father, Cush, to be known around the world. So the Chinese did not have the first emperor, and you can see now the source from where Chinese emperors obtained some of their traditions (i.e. the symbol of the dragon and the practice of castrating male servants in the palace).

Genesis 10:10 "And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar."

"His kingdom" is "Nimrod's kingdom". "Babel" in the Hebrew tongue is "Bab-ili", and it comes from the root word #1101, "Confusion, Babylon, government of confusion." Babylon is the first attempt of man in forming his cities of confusion.

Tradition states that Semiramis was an inn/brothel keeper in the city of Erech. Semiramis was a native of Erech, which as evidenced by it's name seems to have been built by a Hamitic family (Ham's wife was said to have been descended from Cain who built the first Erech in honor of his son). The name Semiramis is a later, Hellenized form of the Sumerian name "Sammur-amat", or "gift of the sea."

Because another of the cities said to have been built by Nimrod was Accad, an older theory connects him with Sargon the Great (this is Cain!), grandfather of Naram-Sin, since, according to the Sumerian king list, that king first built Agade (Akkad). The assertion of the king list that it was Sargon who built Akkad has been called into question, however, with the discovery of inscriptions mentioning the place in the reigns of some of Sargon's predecessors, such as kings Enshakushanna and Lugal-Zage-Si of Uruk. Moreover, Sargon (Cain) was credited with founding Babylon in the Babylonian Chronicle (ABC 19:51), another city (Babel) attributed to Nimrod in Genesis. However, a different tablet (ABC 20:18-19) suggests that Sargon merely "dug up the dirt of the pit" of the original Babylon, and rebuilt it in its later location fronting Akkad.

Matthew 24:37 "But as the days of Noah were so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."
You can spend the rest of your life analyzing the symbolism in lady gaga videos; reading books on secret societies; visiting conspiracy websites; playing church and celebrating Nimrod and Semiramis holidays, but you will not be of any help or usefulness to our Heavenly Father. If you don't understand the Book of Genesis, you will not understand Revelation or anything inbetween. If your church or pastor does not teach the real story of Adam and Eve, then sorry, you are already a part of Satan's system and a spiritual citizen of Babylon.

The Tower of Babel was the first one world government and now we are neck high in the second as in written in Revelation. Noah lived nine-hundred fifty years, long enough to see the Tower of Babel and the events of that time. In "A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry", Nimrod is credited as the grand master of all masons.

We are living in the last generation of confusion, or Babylonia. A majority of Christians are putting their trust in the false doctrines and traditions of men, and being conditioned into a position of accepting the Antichrist as the Messiah, upon his arrival. Most of the church has embraced the ancient, false, religion of Old Babylon, which is satan worship disguised as various forms of Nimrod and Semiramis (valentine's day; easter; sun worship; moon worship; mother child worship; baal; rapture; anti-Christ worship = satan worship). Add to that...incest, sodomy, adultery. We are reliving the times of Nimrod; things are going to get worse.

Revelation 17:5 "And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH."

Revelation 17:15 "And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues."
Numbers 24:21 "And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock."

Baal and Ashtaroth
Baal worship is headed by Satan himself. After Nimrod and Semiramis, the spread of Baal and Easter (Ashtaroth) worship was spread throughout the world by Jezebel (meaning "daughter of Baal" in Punic). She was married to king Ahab of Israel, by her father Eth-Baal, for the sole purpose of spreading the worship of Baal and Easter throughout the known world (reference the work "Phoenicia" by George Rawlinson). Wicked, Kenite, Zidonian queen Jezebel was ruling with Ahab on the throne over the Ten Tribes of the house of Israel. Jezebel was truly a wicked queen, she murdered prophets of GOD, brought in all forms of Baal worship (including grove/orgies and Ashtorath), and forced the filthy practices on all the people. Jezebel and Ahab took all forms of worshipping GOD completely out of the house of Israel.

I Kings 16:33 "And Ahab made a grove; and Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him."

I Kings 16:31 "And it came to pass, as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that he [Ahab] took to wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshipped him."

I Kings 18:4 "For it was so, when Jezebel cut off the prophets of the Lord, that Obadiah took an hundred prophets, and hid them by fifty in a cave, and fed them with bread and water."

Acts 12:4 "And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people."

Easter is a heathen rite and pagan holiday to the false goddess "Ishtar" (Semiramis - wife of Nimrod), and it is a disgrace that the Word is entered here in the Scriptures in relationship with the feast of Passover. This is the only place int the Bible that this word is used. The Strong's Concordance and Greek Dictionary calls attention to the fact that this is the only place in the entire Bible where this word exists. When we go to the Strong's Greek dictionary we see # 3957; "Pascha, pas'-khah; the Passover (the meal, the day, the festival or the special sacrifices connected with it):" The word Easter is not in the Word of GOD, and what it should read here is "Passover".

Everyone knows what the Statue of Liberty is, but how many know it’s true history and symbolism? A little investigation will reveal who was REALLY behind the Statue of Liberty, and it’s relationship to idol worship and Nimrod.
The Statue of Liberty
The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World (

According to the United States Government’s website for the statue (, the statue was a “gift” from the people of France to the people of the United States. However, research will show it was a Freemason idea, executed by FreeMasons, and dedicated with heavy Masonic rituals.
From the US website: (
“AT A DINNER at the home of Edouard de Laboulaye, near Versailles, France, in the summer of 1865, was born the idea of presenting to the United States a monument…”

From “”, a site devoted to Freemasonry, in an article entitled “Masonry and the Statue of Liberty“:
“In the summer of 1865, a group of Frenchmen were gathered together one evening at the home of the well-known author, Edouard Rene de Laboulaye, in the village of Glavingny, a suburb of Paris. Among those present were Oscar and Edmond de Lafayette, grandsons of the Marquis d’ Lafayette, Masonic brother of George Washington; Henri Martin, the noted historian and French Mason; and a young artist from Colmar in French (later German) Alsace by the name of Frederic Auguste Bartholdi”
Note that there were prominent FreeMason’s at this first meeting, not of public, but of private origin’s, on the idea of a statue.
Next, the official U.S. site states that the sculptor Bartholdi travelled to the U.S. but does not mention how he was inspired to make the Statue in the form of a woman godess…
From the Masonic World article:
“Armed with letters of introduction and full of high hopes, Bartholdi sailed for America, although it is said that he did not have even a rough drawing of the proposed monument. Two weeks later, while standing on the deck of the ship Pereire steaming up Lower New York Bay, he caught a vision of a magnificent goddess holding aloft a torch in one hand and welcoming all visitors to the land of freedom and opportunity.
Continuing on, we learn from the official U.S. site that a “Franco-American Union” was established in France to raise money for the statue. However, from the Masonic World article:
“Under the leadership of Henri Martin (a prominent freemason), and inspired perhaps by the fact that so many of the sponsors of the Franco-American Union were members of the Masonic Fraternity, a campaign netting one million francs was completed by 1880.”
Note also, that the Mason’s were given a private viewing of the completed Statue before it’s trip to the United States n the summer of 1884:
“Around this time, Bartholdi, who was a member of Lodge Alsace Lorraine in Paris, which was composed of intellectuals, writers and government representatives, invited his brothers to view his masterpiece prior to its leaving their native land for America. It is also reported that in November of that year, he delivered a lecture and gave the Lodge a report on the history and various methods used in the creation of the statue. In 1887, after the statue was dedicated at its final resting place, Bartholdi told his Lodge brothers of the ardent welcome he had received in New York and of the wide enthusiasm created by his work.”
In the United States, plans were made for the Mason’s to perform a ritual in the laying of the cornerstone of the pedestal, on which the Statue would stand:
From the U.S. Official Site:
“The cornerstone of the pedestal was laid by William A. Brodie, Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of New York State, with impressive Masonic ceremony on August 5, 1884.”

(From Masonry and the Statue of Liberty):
“in America plans were being made for the laying of the cornerstone of the pedestal. Chairman William M. Evarts of the American Committee contacted the Grand
Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of New York, and requested a Masonic ceremony “appropriate to the occasion

It had been a tradition in America to have the cornerstone of major public and private buildings and monuments consecrated with full Masonic rites, ever since President George Washington (Himself a freemason), on September 18, 1793, had personally laid the cornerstone of the United States Capital, with the assistance of the Grand Lodge of Maryland. Similarly, the cornerstone of the Washington Monument was laid in a Masonic ceremonydelegating the laying of the cornerstone to the Masonic Fraternity was a fitting tribute…”
“By traditional ceremony, the cornerstone was then tested and being found, square, level and plumb, the Deputy Grand Master completed the work by applying the mortar and by having the stone lowered firmly into place. The Grand Master then struck three blows with the gavel and declared the stone duly laid. The elements of consecration, corn, wine and oil, were next presented by R. .W. . Brothers Lawrence, Vrooman and Ten Eyck.”
On the dedication of the completed Statue of Liberty (From Masonry and the Statue of Liberty):
“Dedication Day, October 28, 1886, was declared a holiday in New York City. Charles P. Stone, Grand Marshal, led the 20,000 paraders, including many Masonic Lodges, from 57th Street past President Crover Cleveland’s reviewing stand at Madison Square Park. [Masonic] Brother Henry C. Potter, Episcopal Bishop of
New York, gave the Invocation”

“The main speaker was Chauncey M. Depew, United States Senator, railroad president, one of the most famous orators in American history, and an active member of Kane Lodge 454, having been raised in 1885.”
Finally, in it’s appearance and styling, we can see the symbol of Semeramis, Nimrod’s consort and later deified godess, who became the Jezebel and Ishtar, Ashteroth, Venus, Diana, and all other godesses of the ancient world. For more information on this, see the post “Nimrod Part 14: Nimrod, Semisari, and the Catholic Church as the Babylonian Mystery Religion“, and “Nimrod Part 13: Semiramis and the Catholic Church
A commemorative coin from the Catholic Church, showing a “Statue of Liberty” emblem of the church, with the saying “The Whole World is her Seat” – note the same solar (sun) rays emanating from her head as the statue of Liberty.

That the statue was of Freemason origin, design, and construction can be no doubt. That she is a solar (sun) “godess” can be no doubt. That she is the symbolized deification of Semiramis/Jezebel spirit spoken of in the Book of Revelations can be no doubt.
A symbol of liberty and freedom, is in actuallity, a symbol of Freemason’s core belief, which you should want to find out more about…

Overhead shot of the statue, showing the Sun Rays pattern fort on which the pedestal sits

“Columbia” (Lady Liberty), the one-time
proposed symbol for the United States.

She is “illuminating” us…

Semiramis and the Catholic Church

From “The Two Babylon’s”, 1826:
“Now, as the Babylon of the Apocalypse (Catholic Church) is characterized by the name of “MYSTERY,” so the grand distinguishing feature of the ancient Babylonian system was the Chaldean “MYSTERIES,” that formed so essential a part of that system.
Their (Nimrod’s Babylon/Catholic Church) primary object was to introduce privately, by little and little, under the seal of secrecy and the sanction of an oath, what it would not have been safe all at once and openly to propound.
Chaldean Mysteries can be traced up to the days of Semiramis, who lived only a few centuries after the flood, known to have impressed upon the ante-flood peoples the image of her own depraved and polluted mind.
She herself was a paragon of unbridled lust and licentiousness, but in the MYSTERIES which she had a chief hand in writing, she was worshipped as:


Semiramis raised the very city (Babylon) where she had reigned as the grand seat of idolatry and “consecrated” prostitution. Thus, was this Chaldean queen a fit and remarkable prototype of the “Woman” of the Apocalypse, with the golden cup in her hand, and the name on her forehead, “Mystery, Babylon the Great”, mother of harlots and abominations of the earth:

It is noteworth to see that the Roman Catholic Church itself actually used the symbol of the woman bearing the Cup, with the legend around her “Sedet super universum”, “The Whole World is her Seat” on it’s celebration coin of the Jubilee: (note, who else does that woman remind you of with her “sun rays”?)

Since it was dangerous for the church, during it’s early formation, to introduce such Satanic emblems out in the open, just as in Nimrod’s time, they were introduce thru rituals and oath’s, to include confessions, where by the “priest” would know intimate knowledge of the “initiate” which could be used to bind them to an oath of secrecy.

Ever wonder why, though in the New Testament, it makes no distinction between the congregation and the priest’s when it comes to confession of sins (i.e., the leaders were to admit their sins to the congregation), that is not the way it is in the Catholic Church (or any church for that matter). Exactly WHO are the leader’s of the church confessing their sins to?
This is why Paul siad “The mystery of iniquity doth already work” (2 Thess ii 7). It was corrupting the “church” before the “church” became a religion!
So, who does the Catholic Church really worship, Mary or the original harlot, Semaramis, in disguise as Mary?

Nimrod  Freemasonry  Nimrod

From, comes the following tidbits:
Hiram, the architect of Solomon’s Temple (One of the most famous of Masons):
An Oriental legend traces the lineage of Hiram from Adam through Tubal Cain and Nimrod, the builder of the Tower of Babel.
On Nimrod being a Mason:
Every reading Mason is aware that from the time of the original of the “Cooke” MS. Constitutions, say A.D. 1400, it has been handed down that the hunter King, Nimrod, was a Grand Master
For some hundreds of years our Constitutions have asserted that Nimrod was a Grand Master and gave the Masons a Charge which we still follow.”
Our oldest Masonic manuscript (Regius Poem, dated approximately 1390) traces Masonry not to Solomon but to Nimrod and Euclid, in a still earlier time.”
The oldest known Masonic text, the “Old Charges,” which dates at least as far back as 1400 A.D., sets out a legendary heritage that begins with the antediluvian (pre-flood) patriarch Jabal, who discovered geometry (“the which Science is called Massonrie”) and wrote down his findings on pillars of stone. After Noah’s Flood destroyed all human civilization, the Egyptian sage Hermes Trismegistus rediscovered this knowledge and passed it on in a lineage that includes Nimrod.”
From Manly P. Hall’s “The Secret Teachings of All Ages“:
The rakshasas or men-demons of Lanka, the opponents conquered by Rama in the Ramayana, are some of the latest representatives of the Atlanteans in their last days. These rakshasas correspond to the Greek titans, the Egyptian colossal heroes, the Chaldean izdubars, the Jewish ‘eimim (terrifiers) of the land of Moab, and with the famous giants anakim (`anaqim) mentioned in Numbers 13:33.  According to Manly P. Hall, Izudbar was Nimrod, thus he was a giant, or Nephilim (anakim), a descendent of the Fallen Angels.
“…In his Chaldean Account of the Genesis, George Smith, copying from the cuneiform cylinders, in describing the wanderings of the hero Izdubar (Nimrod)…”
From “The Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and it’s kindred Sciences“:
The legend of the Craft in the Old Constitutiom refere to Nimrod as one of
the founders of Masonry, Thus in the York MS. No. 1, we read : At ye making of ye toure (tower) of Babell there was Masonrie first much esteemed of, and the King of Babilon was called Nimrod, a Mason hmself, and loved well Masons
And the Cooke MS. thus repeats the story: “And this same Nembroth (Nimrod) began the towre of babilon and he taught to his werkemen the craft of  Masonrie, and he had with him many Masons more than forty thousand.  And he loved and cherished them well
“…The Lenadowne Manuscript, whose date is about 1660, it is said that Nimrod gave a charge to the Masons that “they should ordaine the most wise and cunning man to be ‘Master of the King’“…
Nimrod & Semiramis
who was born on December 25th, the High Sabbath of Babylon, was the founder of Babylon and the city of Nineveh.  In the history of mankind, Nimrod stands unequalled for his symbolism of evil and Satanic practices. He is credited for having founded Freemasonry and for building the legendary Tower of Babel, in defiance of God's will. In talmudic literature, he is noted as "he who made all the people rebel against God." Pes. 94b. The legend of the Midrash recounts that when Nimrod was informed of Abraham's birth, he ordered all the male children killed, to be certain of eliminating him. Abraham was hidden in a cave, but in latter life he was discovered by Nimrod, who then ordered him to worship fire. Abraham refused and was thrown into the fire.
    The legendary symbol for Nimrod is "X." The use of this symbol always denotes witchcraft. When "X" is used as a shortened form meaning Christmas, it actually means "to celebrate the feast of Nimrod." A double X, which has always meant to double-cross or betray, in its fundamental meaning indicates one's betrayal into the hands of Satan. When American corporations use the "X" in their logo, such as "Exxon," the historic Rockefeller firm of Standard Oil of New Jersey, there can be little doubt of this hidden meaning.
    The importance of Nimrod in any study of the occult cannot be over-emphasized. Because of the powers given him by the clothing of Adam and Eve, Nimrod became the first man to rule the whole world. He indulged that power by launching excesses and horrors which have never been equalled. Ever since the time of Nimrod, Babylon has been the symbol of depravity and lust. Nimrod also introduced the practice of genocide to the world. His grandfather, Ham, having consorted with other races, and brought children of mixed race into the world, was persuaded by his consort, the evil Naamah, to practice ritual murder and cannibalism. She informed Ham that by killing and eating fair-skinned people, his descendants could regain their superior qualities. Throughout the ensuing centuries, the fair-skinned descendants of Shem, Noah's oldest son, have ritually been slaughtered by the darker descendants of Ham and Nimrod, in the world's most persistent campaign of racial and religious persecution. Not only did Nimrod kill and eat the fair-skinned descendants of Shem, in his fury and hatred he often burned them alive. The type of human sacrifice involving the eating of the slaughtered human victims derived its name from the combined names of his uncle, Canaan, and the demon god Baal, the two names being combined to form the word "cannibal." Nimrod was also known in ancient history by the names of Marduk, Bel, and Merodach. Because of his importance in its history, Babylon was known as the Land of Nimrod. Nimrod is also cited in the most ancient Masonic constitutions as the founder of Freemasonry. The Curse Of Canaan: A Demonology Of History by Eustace Mullins

The Illuminati is a Luciferian religion that is counterfeit to the church of Jesus Christ [not the Mormon one]. Illuminati means, "Light Bearers" or "Enlightened Ones". The Illuminati belief system says that freedom is only obtained through the entrance of true or pure light (sodomy) and life (sacrifice) is only obtained through death. They tell their people that nothing can ever penetrate that power because the [unholy] trinity of Cain, Nimrod, and Joseph seals it in. The core religion of their belief system comes from the Cabala, a book containing mysticism, and written by a sect of the Pharisees who went into Babylon after the destruction of Jerusalem. As a matter of fact, the holy language of the Illuminati is Hebrew. THE MASTER PLAN OF THE ILLUMINATED ROTHSCHILDS: Ron Patton interviews Marion Knox
Nimrod was the first man to seek power for its own sake. From this will to power came cruelty and decadence.— Mark Booth; The Secret History of the World
The ancient Greek historian, Diodorus, reports that Queen Semiramis erected a 130-foot obelisk in Babylon and it was associated with sun worship and represented the phallus of the sun god Baal or Nimrod. Some Masonic researchers say that the word 'obelisk' literally means 'Baal's shaft' or 'Baal's organ of reproduction'. It is for this reason that the obelisk also represents the Illuminati bloodlines.--David Icke
Fish were originally worshiped as a symbol of Nimrod,  Each priest is depicted wearing a fish-head mitre. One of the names of this God in Babylon and Philistia was Dagon (dag=fish, on=sun) "The head of the fish formed a mitre above that of a man, while its scaly, fin-like tail fell as a cloak behind, leaving the human feet and limbs exposed." Layard's Babylon & Ninevah, p. 343

  Maltese cross

Statue of Liberty
  On the left here is an ancient depiction of Queen Semiramis, note she is holding a cross, and alongside is the Statue of Liberty holding the lighted torch, a symbol of Nimrod. --Icke

Here you can see Queen Semiramis of Babylon (goddess of the moon), holding the torch with the eternal flame of Nimrod (sun god).

The two faces of the god Janus - the Babylonian Nimrod.

Eagle-headed Nimrod

1. Symbol of the sun.
2. Compass (Freemasons use this symbol).
3. Cresent moon and star
4. Solar wheel
5. Three layered mitre
6. Cross of Horus (priest of Horus would wear this).
   *place your pointer on picture

The back entrance to the Kodak Theatre where the *oscars* are handed out. The Babylonian gate.
Nimrod with and without Eagle head over gate in Hollywood.

Hand (hidden)
Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi (b. 1834 - d. 1904) Freemason and designer and sculptor of the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor. The Statue of Liberty is actually a representation of the Goddess Columbia and is coded full of secret society meanings and occult symbolism. Bartholdi was one of the early members of Lodge Alsace-Lorraine, Paris (Oct. 14, 1875) which was composed of prominent intellectuals, writers and government representatives.  [source]
Bartholdi, like many French Freemasons of his time, was deeply steeped in ‘Egyptian’ rituals, and it has often been said that he conceived the original statue as an effigy of the goddess Isis, and only later converted it to a ‘Statue of Liberty’ for New York harbour when it was rejected for the Suez Canal."

The goddess Isis is known by many names, including Juno.

Statue of Liberty and Freemasonry (various manifistations of the goddess in the mystery schools)- full article here -
The Queen of Babylon

Any effort to trace the origins of the myth, legend, and lore of goddess-worship will eventually lead one back to a single historical figure---Semiramis, wife of Nimrod and queen of Babylon, and this is especially true when considering the goddess/planet Venus.
Before we can begin to deal with Semiramis though, we must (as with any historical figure) gain at least a general understanding of her cultural and temporal setting. Since I have found in my researches that neither proven scientific truth nor gleanings of fact from the body of ancient legends in any way contradicts a proper understanding of biblical revelation, I will use the scriptural framework of history as a basis upon which to reconstruct the story of Semiramis the woman.
When Noah and his family left the ark after the flood, they settled first at the northern feet of Ararat facing what is today Georgia, USSR. From here, these eight souls began to spread out into the surrounding districts of northern Iran and Syria, as well as eastern Turkey. After a considerable period (perhaps 5 to 6 hundred years), the families of Noah's descendants began to scatter a bit more widely due to increasing population, and perhaps some degree of rivalry or even enmity between the families of Japheth, Shem, and Ham. In this way we find that within about half a millennium the entire "fertile crescent", as well as the Nile valley, the Anatolian and Iranian plateaus, Arabia, and Ethiopia have been sparsely settled---but with a decided majority of Noah's descendants living in the lower regions of Mesopotamia (which would come to be called Sumer and Akkad).
Modern archaeology has confirmed the fact that the first inhabitants of these areas were homogeneous in both race and culture, and the most reliable researches indicate that it was from here that population, animal husbandry, metallurgy, agriculture, and "citification" spread throughout the earth. The scientific and scriptural views are in exact agreement upon the origin and spread of races and civilization---the only point of difference is the time scale involved! Whereas the scriptures clearly indicate the existence of all these elements of civilization long before the flood; orthodox science, by it's denial of the bible is required to construct a mythical stone age several millennia long in order to account for the same phenomena.
It was in Mesopotamia that the first cities were built after the flood, and the first of these was quite naturally named after the very first city built by man before the flood---Enoch. Due to vagaries of linguistic permutation, this name has come down to us as Erech or Uruk in Sumeria. In all there were seven major cities built near the head of the Persian Gulf, leading to the name "Land of the Seven Cities" commonly found in the early mythologies of the world. These seven cities are enumerated in Genesis as those which were conquered by Nimrod, establishing the world's first empire. The earliest Babylonian legends tell of a conquering people who came up out of the Persian Gulf and established an empire from these cities. This seems to fit well with what we know of the movements of Nimrod in his early career. He was a native of Ethiopia and was widely traveled among the few populated areas of those days. When he set out to build himself an army of conquest, he recruited from his "cousins" the descendants of Sheba and Dedan who had come up through Arabia to settle on the Asian mainland at the Straight of Hormuz and on the Indus river in what is now Afghanistan (these people were the Dravidians who were driven southward into India by the later Aryan invasion). After raising his army, Nimrod ferried them up the gulf in the world's first naval armada, and conquered his empire. The best estimates place the time of the conquest as about 4000 to 3500 BC, and about 1000 years after the flood of Noah.
In the midst of the tumult of war Nimrod and Semiramis met--and in none too savory circumstances, for tradition states that she was an inn/brothel keeper in the city of Erech---leading one to speculate upon the nature of their initial acquaintance. Semiramis was a native of Erech, which as evidenced by it's name seems to have been built by a Hamitic family (Ham's wife was said to have been descended from Cain who built the first Erech in honor of his son). The name Semiramis is a later, Hellenized form of the Sumerian name "Sammur-amat", or "gift of the sea."
The initial element "sammur" when translated into Hebrew becomes "Shinar" (the biblical name for lower Mesopotamia), and is the word from which we derive "Sumeria". This one tarnished woman then, had such a lasting impact upon world history that not only do we call by her name the land from which civilization flowed, but God himself through the sacred writer has let us know that its distinguishing characteristic was that it was "the Land of Shinar," or Semiramis. Very little has come down to us through the millennia concerning Semiramis' rise to power, but it is safe to assume that it was initially upon Nimrod's coattails that she rode, although later in life as well as throughout history her influence overwhelmingly obscured that of her husband. Of course, it would not do to have an ex-harlot upon the throne, so the "polite fiction" was invented that she was a virgin sprung from the sea at Nimrod's landing, and hence a suitable bride for the emperor(thus the title Semiramis which has totally obscured her original name).
Semiramis was the instigator in forming the false religion aimed at supporting their rule, and of course her suggestion fell upon open ears. The religion she invented was based primarily upon a corruption of the primeval astronomy formulated by Noah's righteous ancestors before the flood. In the original this system depicted by means of constellations the story of Satan's rebellion and the war in the heavens, his subversion of mankind, the fall of Adam and Eve, the promise of One to come who would suffer and die to relieve man from the curse of sin then be installed as Lord of Creation, and the final re-subjugation of the cosmos to God through Him.
These eternal truths were corrupted by her (rather, quite obviously, by the evil one controlling her) into a mythic cycle wherein the great dragon is depicted as the rightful lord of the universe whose throne has been temporarily usurped by One whom we can recognize as the God of the Bible. The serpent creates man in his present miserable state, but promises that a child would one day born of a divine mother---which child would supplant God, become a god himself, and return rulership of the Earth to the serpent. These fables were based upon the then widely-known story of the constellations, and were introduced under the guise of revealing the hidden esoteric knowledge concealed in them (regardless of the fact that the original was quite straightforward).
Although this esotericism was the second element in Semiramis' cult, it only masked the actual goal which was the worship of the "heavenly host," which the Bible equates with Satan's army of fallen angels. Satan was quite willing to receive worship "by proxy", hence the third major element of the mystery religion was emperor-worship. This religion was propagated by a hierarchy of priests and priestesses, to whom were assigned the task of initiating the populace at large into it's ascending degrees of revelation, culminating at the highest level in both direct worship of Satan and demon-possession.
Although Nimrod was a brilliant strategist, he made a fatal blunder when he allowed Semiramis to retain full control over this religious hierarchy, and through it the minds and hearts of the people; for when a schism occurred between them she was able to turn it from a tool of support into a deadly weapon. The rift between husband and wife occurred when the queen bore an illegitimate son, and the king threatened her with both dethronement and exposure of her true origin. Semiramis, of course would not allow this to take place, and devised a plot to overthrow Nimrod.
During the course of the New Year's festivities at which the advent of Nimrod's rule was celebrated, there was a certain feast exclusively for the royal family and the upper echelons of the priesthood. During this feast, which included "courses" of psychedelic and hallucinogenic drugs, a year-old ram was traditionally sacrificed by being torn limb-from-limb while still alive, and it's flesh eaten raw. This ram symbolized the old year passing into the heavens to allow room for the new year. A new-born lamb was then presented which, symbolizing the new year, would be kept and fattened for the next year's ceremonies. This year Semiramis directed the ritual according to the formula, with the exception that when the time came for the ram to be slaughtered, it was the king who was torn to pieces at the hands of the drug-crazed priesthood and Semiramis' bastard son was installed as king. Thus Nimrod, the mighty hunter, died a horrible death as a trapped beast himself.
Semiramis named her son Damu (from the Sumerian "dam," or blood), which in the later Babylonian language became Dammuzi, in Hebrew Tammuz, and in Greek Adonis. Of course, Semiramis assumed the regency for her infant son, and ruled as absolute monarch for 42 more years. In order to avoid having to kill her son on the next New Year's Day, she instituted an annual nation-wide sports competition, the winner of which would have the "honor" of taking Damu's place and ascending into heaven to become a god.
Semiramis was not unopposed in her arrogation of the regency, however, or her rule as a woman. The military arm of the government was divided into two camps for and against her, and a short war ensued which ended when the populace (roused by the priesthood) not only refused to support the "rebels" but actively opposed them. In the course of this war, though, things became so close that Semiramis was forced to build a system of walls, towers, and gates around Babylon to defend herself. She was thus the first to build fortifications and her crown afterwards was in the form of the turreted walls of Babylon. To oppose the accusations of "mere" womanhood laid against her, she had herself deified as the mother of the god Damu (since only a god can beget a god) , and installed as "The Queen of Heaven" pictured in the constellation Cassiopeia, which the ancients had intended as a corporate representation of those people faithful to God who will be enthroned by Him after the end of the age.
In spite of her cleverness, though, she also sowed the seeds of her own destruction. As she raised her son, she imbued him with divinity in the eyes of the priests and people as the means of retaining control as the divine mother without seeming to aggrandize herself. As Damu grew he became used to having every whim instantly gratified by a subservient, indeed groveling, populace. For safety's sake he had a personal bodyguard/companion group which he was never without, and which formed an elite corps of soldiery loyal and accountable to him alone. Upon coming to maturity and demanding of his mother to be installed as king, she not only refused him this--but, seeing him now as a challenge to her rule, slated him for the same death she had meted to his father. Damu caught on to her scheme, and pre-empted his "assumption" by slaying his mother with his own sword, and putting down any priestly protests by purging the hierarchy of all who would not vow allegiance to him. Thus Semiramis died after reigning as queen over Babylon for 102 years.
These events laid the groundwork for all of the pagan religious systems of antiquity, as well as many alive today. Semiramis, in particular was the model and original of every goddess and female cult figure in the ancient and modern worlds (either directly or by derivation); and thus it essential to know her story in order to discern what is factual legend and what is merely myth.